Monday, October 29, 2007
Compassion
If craving is the source of sufferings, then logically, learning how to give will undo the cause. If a person can be truly compassionate, then he truly realizes what it means by "no self."
I don't really understand, but what is it about human nature that we cannot learn contentment, but desiring more and more, like power, money, and attention? Why do we take the sickly pleasures in other peoples' failures? Why do we sometimes involve in gossips and divisive talks that bring people apart? And how can we be so indifferent to other peoples' sufferings?
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Fundamental Questions
2. If, as Nagarjuna said, that everything is relative and has no independent, fixed nature, then how does cause and effect work? If a cause necessitates the effect, then apparently there's an inherent and fixed character about cause. Is Nagarjuna saying there's no cause and effect relationship after all? If so, is he denying the fundamental principle (Karma) of his religion?
3. The nature of mind. If our current minds evolve from our minds yesterday, and the ones yesterday from the day before yesterday, the day before yesterday from last week, which is from last month, last year, all the way back to the time when we were still in our mothers' wombs, then imagine the moment when the new life first appears, when the egg and sperm first met. Where does that very first conscious come from? If from somewhere else, how come we cannot remember what happened before we entered our current bodies?
Friday, October 19, 2007
Examination of Causality
Friday, September 28, 2007
A shity day
Finally, I still want to remind myself-做人要潇洒, 有自信. And as Hsin-Hao pointed out, I still had a lot of etiquettes to learn.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
The characteristics of successful people
Maybe I slept too much in the afternoon, so I can't really sleep right now. Why not put down some thoughts about life?
I think what I learned the most in this past three weeks is not materials from classes. Rather, it's how to allocate limited resources based on rational decision. If time can go back, I really would not waste time on studying philosophy and comparative politics.
Here is something I found quite meaningful and would like to share with people who often cannot make up their minds and who are still uncertain about their future goals. This passage will probably not tell them the answer on what they should do, but it nonetheless provides a very good framework on how to think about choices in life.
"...那些「二○%的人」和其他平凡人的最大差別,其實不是在於他們選擇做什麼,而是他們選擇不做什麼。時間是最沒有彈性的資源,沒有人可以使時間放慢腳步,或是加速前進,不用時也不能加以儲藏,或是花錢買到時間。「二○%的人」在分配這樣一種既稀少又缺乏彈性的資源時,是非常果斷的。不論提供的待遇是多麼的有吸引力,只要覺得自己不喜歡,就會立刻抽身。不論是有意無意,他們始終將一件事情放在心裡,而那件事可以幫助我們保持成功。這件事就是:找出你不喜歡的事,並且不再去做..."
In this regard, I admire Alex very very much. Some might say he's too focused, but at least he's very clear on what he's good at and he uses his strengths very well.
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Why MD/PhD?
There are many ways to explore the nature of our existence. I can think philosophically, and I can read books on it, but I think I will choose the path of science. I'm good at quantitative reasoning and working in a systematic way, and I really like to understand things from the most fundamental level. Thermodynamics determines the structures of proteins, and protein structures determine their functions. It's intellectually satisfying to think about everything in life with this bottom-up approach, for it provides a unifying framework of understanding things. After all, aren't we all seeking the ultimate reality and truth that explain everything?